Apple hit with $110.7 million verdict in wireless patent battle with Spanish firm

In a major courtroom setback, Apple has been ordered to pay $110.7 million after a U.S. jury determined the company violated wireless technology patents owned by Spain-based TOT Power Control. The decision follows a lengthy legal dispute that centers on key components used in iPhones and other Apple products.

The case revolves around technology that optimizes power usage in devices relying on 3G networks—specifically, how signals adapt in response to fluctuating interference levels. TOT Power Control, led by inventor and engineer Alvaro Lopez-Medrano, holds patents in this area, though the company itself does not produce consumer products. Instead, its focus has been on licensing its intellectual property, and it has previously taken legal action against major players in the mobile space, including Samsung, Verizon, LG, and T-Mobile.

TOT first brought its claims against Apple in 2021, alleging that the Cupertino-based tech giant had declined to license its patented power-management systems despite earlier attempts to initiate discussions. Apple, in turn, argued that the patents were invalid and not applicable to the technology in question—but the jury disagreed.

The outcome of the trial adds another layer to Apple’s ongoing battles over wireless technologies and patent licensing. While the company has largely moved on from 3G in its newest iPhones, including the iPhone 15 series, many legacy technologies and devices remain covered under patent terms that span decades. That legal web continues to entangle companies like Apple, even as they develop more advanced wireless standards such as 5G and beyond.

TOT sought not only damages for past infringement, but also future royalties tied to Apple’s use of the patented technology. Whether Apple will be required to pay ongoing fees is still unclear and may depend on the result of future appeals.

In a statement to the press, Apple voiced its frustration with the ruling, confirming plans to challenge the verdict. Legal experts suggest the company may pursue a multi-pronged appeal that questions both the interpretation of the patents and the process that led to the jury’s finding.

While Apple’s loss in this case won’t significantly dent its bottom line, the ruling serves as a reminder of the legal risks associated with mobile hardware development—particularly in an industry where core technologies are often covered by overlapping and fiercely defended patents. As innovation pushes forward, courtroom disputes over foundational wireless infrastructure remain a powerful force in shaping the financial and technical realities of the mobile landscape.